Monday, April 2, 2012

Cetuximab-based or bevacizumab-based first-line treatment in patients with KRAS p.G13D-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis.

Source

aDepartment of Medicine III, Klinikum Grosshadern bInstitute of Medical Informatics, Biometry, and Epidemiology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany cDepartment of Internal Medicine, Knappschaftskrankenhaus dCenter for Clinical Studies in Oncology eInstitute of Pathology, Ruhr-University fDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Berufsgenossenschaftliche Kliniken Bergmannsheil Bochum, Germany gCECOG, Central European Cooperative Oncology Group hDepartment of Medicine I, Clinical Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria iKBC Rebro, Oncology Department, Zagreb, Croatia.

Abstract

KRAS p.G13D mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has been identified as representing a cetuximab-sensitive subtype of KRAS mutant mCRC. This analysis aims to answer the question of whether first-line treatment of p.G13D mCRCs should include cetuximab or bevacizumab. Fifty-four patients with p.G13D mutant mCRC were pooled in this analysis. All patients underwent systemic first-line treatment with a fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin/irinotecan that was combined with either cetuximab or bevacizumab. The analysis of cetuximab-based and bevacizumab-based regimens in mCRC patients with p.G13D-mutated tumours indicated comparable data for the overall response rate (58 vs. 57%) and progression-free survival (8.0 vs. 8.7 months; hazard ratio: 0.96, P=0.9). Overall survival (OS) was 20.1 months in patients treated with cetuximab-based first-line therapy compared with 14.9 months in patients receiving bevacizumab-containing regimens (hazard ratio: 0.70, P=0.29). Logistic regressions modelling OS revealed oxaliplatin-based first-line treatment to correlate with a poor outcome (P=0.03). Moreover, a strong trend in favour of capecitabine compared with infusional 5-FU (P=0.06) was observed. Response to treatment correlated with OS in patients receiving cetuximab-based, but not bevacizumab-based regimens. This retrospective pooled analysis suggests comparable efficacy of cetuximab-based and bevacizumab-based first-line therapy in patients with p.G13D mutant mCRC. The combination with capecitabine and irinotecan was associated with a more favourable outcome compared with infusional 5-FU and oxaliplatin.

rising stars challenge star trek 2 kathy ireland brooke mueller all star weekend lent undercover boss

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.